Repository navigation
RO-T101 IC Permissions Update #26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Authorization uses default-allow semantics for app login gates and board access:
CanLoginToDispatchAppandCanLoginToCommandAppare rights permissions 29/30 withCanLoginToCommandAppalso serving as the department's run-command permission, whileCanViewCommandBoardsis permission 125 where no row follows 30; this can grant access without an explicit permission, despiteIncidentRoles/GetMyCapabilitiesbeing the exact Core-accepted per-board bitmask on the envelope, with commanders and establishers receiving all capabilities, ICS roles receiving their parts, and everyone else receiving read-only access. In.claude/skills/resgrid-domain/SKILL.mdanddocs/architecture/omni-plan.md:537, require deny-by-default policies that grant access only when the permission is present or an approved, narrowly scoped fallback is intentionally configured and audited, use incident participation for command staff, lane leads, members dispatched directly or through a group/role/unit they crew, or members placed on the board, gate every board control on the capability bitmask, and preserve theX-Resgrid-Client(responder|unit|dispatch|bigboard|command|ic|…) toclient_appmapping and app-specific server behavior, including BigBoard's redacted safe shell for protected departments.Kody rule violation: Implement RBAC with least privilege and deny-by-default
Prompt for LLM
Talk to Kody by mentioning @kody
Was this suggestion helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to help Kody learn from this interaction.